Will the Minister for Water Resources be pleased to state whether the Government has plan to reduce the deficiency/scarcity of water in Balochistan; if so, the details thereof?

Will the Minister for Interior be pleased to state: (a) whether it is a fact that complaints are not timely redressed in FIA Headquarters alongwith the action taken in the matter against Diary No.5476 dated 25-06-2020, Inquiry No.277-D; if not, the reasons thereof; and (b) the time by which action will be taken on the said complaint alongwith the nature of action taken thereof?

Will the Minister for Law and Justice be pleased to state: (a) whether Customs Tribunal established under Section 194 of Custom Act, 1969 is a court or not under the Article 175 of the Constitution of Pakistan; (b) whether customs Ac4 is bound to implement the findings/conclusion of Appellate Tribunal; (c) whether the Custom Appellate Tribunal can get implemented its decisions or not under section l94B of Customs Act; and (d) whether Customs Appellate Tribunal an advise or not the custom authorities to implement the decision made under the section l94B of Custom Act, on the appeal of fficted person?

Will the Minister for Law and Justice be pleased to stale: (a) whether Customs Appellate Tribunal can initiate contempt of court proceedings in terms of section 8 of I94C of Customs Act, on the implementation of the verdict announced under Section l94B of Customs Act or not; (b) if the Customs Appellate Tribunal has no authority to initiate Contempt of Court proceedings, the forum is provided to the aggrieved persons may approach thereof; and (c) whether the Law Ministry including Federal Tax Ombudsman can interpret verdicts of High Court or Tribunal or not?

Will the Minister for Commerce be pleased to state: (a) whether it is a fact that under the import policy appendix-C Serial No.10 sub-class (1) and (4) only companies and commercial importers or a common man could also import goods from abroad; (b) if so, the complete detail alongwith explanation thereof; (c) whether it is also a fact that the construction companies who imported specialized vehicles in accordance with import policy 2013 and 2016, Para 9(ii)5 for their construction work thereof; (d) whether the same vehicles which were used for five years in the companies only, thereafter such vehicles could be sold out or after the completion of the project; and (e) complete details of above in the light of respective import policy?

Will the Minister for Finance and Revenue be pleased to state: (a) whether it is a fact that Customs Act, was published in Urdu language in the year 2017 on the Supreme Court Order; (b) if so, the reasons for not publishing the said Act in Urdu as and when required (after amendments); (c) whether it is not the violation of Supreme Court Order; (d) the time by which the Customs Act, will be published in Urdu Language alongwith the respective amendments made therein during the said years?

Will the Minister for Finance and Revenue be pleased to state whether custom authorities are bound to implement the conclusion/findings of the decision of Appellate Tribunal or not?

Will the Minister for Law and Justice be pleased to state: (a) whether Customs Tribunal established under Section 194 of Custom Act, 1969 is a court or not under the Article 175 of the Constitution of Pakistan; (b) whether customs act, is bound to implement the findings/conclusion of Appellate Tribunal; (c) whether the Custom Appellate Tribunal can get implemented its decisions or not under section 194B of Customs Act; and (d) whether Customs Appellate Tribunal an advise or not the custom authorities to implement the decision made under the section 194B of Custom Act, on the appeal of affected person?

Will the Minister for Law and Justice be pleased to state: (a) whether Customs Appellate Tribunal can initiate contempt of court proceedings in terms of section 8 of 194C of Customs Act, on the implementation of the verdict announced under Section 194B of Customs Act or not; (b) if the Customs Appellate Tribunal has no authority to initiate Contempt of Court proceedings, the forum is provided to the aggrieved persons may approach thereof; and (c) whether the Law Ministry including Federal Tax Ombudsman can interpret verdicts of High Court or Tribunal or not?

Will the Minister for Finance and Revenue be pleased to state: (a) what are the reasons for omitting amendments regarding port demurrage in Section 203 of Customs Act, from the Finance Bill, 2022, since the said amendments were in the best interest of the public; and (b) whether the Government has any intention to restore the omitted amendments through Finance Bill in the National Assembly again?

Will the Minister for Finance and Revenue pleased to state: (a) whether FBR has any mandate to interpret the decision of High Court and Custom Appellate Tribunal; (b) whether the custom authorities are bound to implement the conclusion/fundings of the decision of Custom Appellate Tribunal; and (c) whether custom authorities can issue a show cause notice on the legal question which has already been settled in the decision of Custom Appellate Tribunal; if so, under which law; (d) whether under the sub-clause (d) of para 3 of SRO 886 (1) 2012 dated July 18th 2012 Custom Collectorate can adjudicate the cases of “violation of technical import policy”; (e) if so, the name of the collectorate which will adjudicate the cases of violation of import policy; and (f) the details of general and technical import policy violation under sub-clause (d) of para 3 of SRO 886(1) 2012 date July 18th,2012?

Will the Minister for Finance and Revenue be pleased to state: (a) what are the reasons for omitting amendments regarding port demurrage in Section 203 of Customs Act, from the Finance Bill, 2022, since the said amendments were in the best interest of the public; and (b) whether the Government has any intention to restore the omitted amendments through Finance Bill in the National Assembly again?

Will the Minister for Finance and Revenue pleased to state: (a) whether FBR has any mandate to interpret the decision of High Court and Custom Appellate Tribunal; (b) whether the custom authorities are bound to implement the conclusion/fundings of the decision of Custom Appellate Tribunal; and (c) whether custom authorities can issue a show cause notice on the legal question which has already been settled in the decision of Custom Appellate Tribunal; if so, under which law; (d) whether under the sub-clause (d) of para 3 of SRO 886 (1) 2012 dated July 18th 2012 Custom Collectorate can adjudicate the cases of "violation of technical import policy"; (e) if so, the name of the collectorate which will adjudicate the cases of violation of import policy; and (f) the details of general and technical import policy violation under sub-clause (d) of para 3 of SRO 886(1) 2012 date July 18th, 2012?